BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Psychoanalytische Bibliothek Berlin - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:Psychoanalytische Bibliothek Berlin
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://psybi-berlin.de
X-WR-CALDESC:Veranstaltungen für Psychoanalytische Bibliothek Berlin
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Berlin
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260116T193000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260116T213000
DTSTAMP:20260506T160421
CREATED:20260104T120605Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260106T193304Z
UID:160519-1768591800-1768599000@psybi-berlin.de
SUMMARY:Der Todestrieb - vom Trauma zum Phantasma
DESCRIPTION:Houchang Guilyardi ist Psychoanalytiker\, ehemaliger Direktor der Abteilung für Psychotherapie und Psychoanalyse am Krankenhaus Pitié-Salpêtrière\, Präsident und Mitbegründer der Vereinigung für Psychoanalyse und Medizin\, Mitglied von Espace analytique und Präsident von Ravan Pajouhan.
URL:https://psybi-berlin.de/event/der-todestrieb-vom-trauma-zum-phantasma/
CATEGORIES:Vorträge
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://psybi-berlin.de/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/psa-kolleg_Todestrieb-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260116T193000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260118T130000
DTSTAMP:20260506T160421
CREATED:20260104T121130Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260104T121130Z
UID:160525-1768591800-1768741200@psybi-berlin.de
SUMMARY:Subjektivierung und Todestrieb
DESCRIPTION:Zerstörung\, Hass\, Gewalt\, Missachtung des Anderen sind auf der Tagesordnung. Dem steht der Einzelne hilflos gegenüber. Zudem ist er fortwährend der Propagierung eines schrankenlosen Genießens ausgesetzt. Welcher Ordnung folgt die Psychoanalyse? Inwiefern geben ihre Begriffe – des Genießens und des Todestriebs – eine Orientierung?
URL:https://psybi-berlin.de/event/subjektivierung-und-todestrieb/
CATEGORIES:Wochenendveranstaltungen
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260116T211500
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Berlin:20260116T224500
DTSTAMP:20260506T160421
CREATED:20250902T202120Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260115T172828Z
UID:160141-1768598100-1768603500@psybi-berlin.de
SUMMARY:The “Structure” of Psychoanalysis
DESCRIPTION:Open Seminar and Study Group \nDasUnbehagen New York\, Berlin School for Psychoanalysis\, and in collaboration with Pulsion – International Institute of Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Psychosomatics  \n“[…] the word structure is no better than \nthe word free association […]” \n(J. Lacan\, … ou pire) \nA peculiar dissonance: Whereas no science or theory today would claim to be exclusively “structuralist\,” would embrace “structure” as the first and last word on either the model or the real of its object\, the term structure enjoys ample usage in psychoanalysis\, especially where it defines itself under some influence of the teachings and writings by Jacques Lacan. \nDoes “Lacanian” psychoanalysis cling—for reasons perhaps justifiable—to a notion elsewhere seen as epistemologically obsolete? And then why? Or has the term simply fallen from a height of theoretical precision and rigor into the everydayness of language games where it is bestowed with a halo of gravity\, and employed almost synonymously with “system\,” “architecture\,” “construction\,” “inner core\,” etc. Is “structure” able to afford such imprecision? And what happens to structure—or to that\, what the concept once tried to catch—if “structure” can mean almost anything and next to nothing? Is the sexual structural? Which afterlife of linguistic structuralism is implied in using “signifiers”? What do we inherit from the “elementary structures of kinship” in anthropology? Which resonances with “mathematical structures” could be taken into account? What affectdoes structure “trigger”? \nAnd perhaps most importantly\, how do the so-called “clinical structures\,” or the “way someone is structured”—expressions often used as if designating the property\, the inner makeup of a person\, mind\, or psyche—relate to the attempt at divesting psychoanalysis from psychology by minimalizing its vocabulary and projecting it onto a plane that is determined by the notion of “structure” and only a few others? \nThis seminar aims to address these questions and elaborate on their relevance for psychoanalytic theory and practice today. We will cover pieces of the history of structuralism as well as of the history of the term “structure” preceding or surrounding it; we will think through the theoretical implications of structure for psychoanalysis’s relation to contemporary science; we will confront the structure (in Lacan) with the psychicapparatus (in Freud) as well as the grid (in Bion); we will ask about “clinical structures” and their relevance in analytic work. \n*  *  * \ndr marcus coelen \npsychoanalysis \nnew york / berlin \n+1 347 232 5102 \n+49 156 79 57 01 16 \nmcoelen@icloud.com \n*  *  * \nPD Dr. Marcus Coelen \nInstitut für Allgemeine und \nVergleichende Literaturwissenschaft \nLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München \nmcoelen@lmu.de
URL:https://psybi-berlin.de/event/the-structure-of-psychoanalysis-7/
CATEGORIES:Seminare und Arbeitsgruppen
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://psybi-berlin.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/Structure-of-PA.png
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR